Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(5): 583-589, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234192

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transient acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on healthcare personnel (HCP) gloves and gowns following patient care has been examined. However, the potential for transmission to the subsequent patient has not been studied. We explored the frequency of MRSA transmission from patient to HCP, and then in separate encounters from contaminated HCP gloves and gowns to a subsequent simulated patient as well as the factors associated with these 2 transmission pathways. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study with 2 parts. In objective 1, we studied MRSA transmission from random MRSA-positive patients to HCP gloves and gowns after specific routine patient care activities. In objective 2, we simulated subsequent transmission from random HCP gloves and gowns without hand hygiene to the next patient using a manikin proxy. RESULTS: For the first objective, among 98 MRSA-positive patients with 333 randomly selected individual patient-HCP interactions, HCP gloves or gowns were contaminated in 54 interactions (16.2%). In a multivariable analysis, performing endotracheal tube care had the greatest odds of glove or gown contamination (OR, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.3-12.6 relative to physical examination). For the second objective, after 147 simulated HCP-patient interactions, the subsequent transmission of MRSA to the manikin proxy occurred 15 times (10.2%). CONCLUSION: After caring for a patient with MRSA, contamination of HCP gloves and gown and transmission to subsequent patients following HCP-patient interactions occurs frequently if contact precautions are not used. Proper infection control practices, including the use of gloves and gown, can prevent this potential subsequent transmission.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Gloves, Protective , Prospective Studies , Health Personnel , Infection Control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(4): 467-473, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994538

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for hand hygiene (HH) while wearing gloves requires removing gloves, performing HH, and donning new gloves between WHO moments. The novel strategy of applying alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) directly to gloved hands might be effective and efficient. DESIGN: A mixed-method, multicenter, 3-arm, randomized trial. SETTING: Adult and pediatric medical-surgical, intermediate, and intensive care units at 4 hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare personnel (HCP). INTERVENTIONS: HCP were randomized to 3 groups: ABHR applied directly to gloved hands, the current standard, or usual care. METHODS: Gloved hands were sampled via direct imprint. Gold-standard and usual-care arms were compared with the ABHR intervention. RESULTS: Bacteria were identified on gloved hands after 432 (67.4%) of 641 observations in the gold-standard arm versus 548 (82.8%) of 662 observations in the intervention arm (P < .01). HH required a mean of 14 seconds in the intervention and a mean of 28.7 seconds in the gold-standard arm (P < .01). Bacteria were identified on gloved hands after 133 (98.5%) of 135 observations in the usual-care arm versus 173 (76.6%) of 226 observations in the intervention arm (P < .01). Of 331 gloves tested 6 (1.8%) were found to have microperforations; all were identified in the intervention arm [6 (2.9%) of 205]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with usual care, contamination of gloved hands was significantly reduced by applying ABHR directly to gloved hands but statistically higher than the gold standard. Given time savings and microbiological benefit over usual care and lack of feasibility of adhering to the gold standard, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization should consider advising HCP to decontaminate gloved hands with ABHR when HH moments arise during single-patient encounters.Trial Registration: NCT03445676.


Subject(s)
Decontamination , Hand Hygiene , Adult , Humans , Child , Ethanol , Hand Hygiene/methods , Hand/microbiology , Health Personnel , 2-Propanol , Hand Disinfection/methods
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2336758, 2023 10 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883088

ABSTRACT

Importance: Current guidelines require hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves, but evidence to support this requirement is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a direct-gloving policy on adherence to infection prevention practices in a hospital setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-method, multicenter, cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 4 academic centers in Baltimore, Maryland, or Iowa City, Iowa, from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017. Data analysis was completed April 25, 2019. Participants were 3790 health care personnel (HCP) across 13 hospital units. Intervention: Hospital units were randomly assigned to direct gloving, with hand hygiene not required before donning gloves (intervention), or to usual care (hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was adherence to the expected practice at room entry and exit. A random sample of HCPs' gloved hands were imprinted on agar plates at entry to contact precautions rooms. The intention-to-treat approach was followed, and all analyses were conducted at the level of the participating unit. Primary and secondary outcomes between treatment groups were assessed using generalized estimating equations with an unstructured working correlation matrix to adjust for clustering; multivariate analysis using generalized estimating equations was conducted to adjust for covariates, including baseline adherence. Results: In total, 13 hospital units participated in the trial, and 3790 HCP were observed. Adherence to expected practice was greater in the 6 units with the direct-gloving intervention than in the 7 usual care units (1297 of 1491 [87%] vs 954 of 2299 [41%]; P < .001) even when controlling for baseline hand hygiene rates, unit type, and universal gloving policies (risk ratio [RR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.97). Glove use on entry to contact precautions rooms was also higher in the direct-gloving units (1297 of 1491 [87%] vs 1530 of 2299 [67%]; P = .008. The intervention had no effect on hand hygiene adherence measured at entry to non-contact precautions rooms (951 of 1315 [72%] for usual care vs 1111 of 1688 [66%] for direct gloving; RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91-1.10]) or at room exit (1587 of 1897 [84%] for usual care vs 1525 of 1785 [85%] for direct gloving; RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.07]). The intervention was associated with increased total bacteria colony counts (adjusted incidence RR, 7.13; 95% CI, 3.95-12.85) and greater detection of pathogenic bacteria (adjusted incidence RR, 10.18; 95% CI, 2.13-44.94) on gloves in the emergency department and reduced colony counts in pediatrics units (adjusted incidence RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.63), with no change in either total colony count (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60 to 1.25] for adult intensive care unit; RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.31-1.10] for hemodialysis unit) or presence of pathogenic bacteria (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.40-2.14] for adult intensive care unit; RR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.15-2.04] for hemodialysis unit) in the other units. Conclusions and Relevance: Current guidelines require hand hygiene before donning nonsterile gloves, but evidence to support this requirement is lacking. The findings from this cluster randomized clinical trial indicate that a direct-gloving strategy without prior hand hygiene should be considered by health care facilities. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03119389.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hand Hygiene , Child , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Health Personnel , Hospitals
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(3): 319-326, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33640109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Published bundles to reduce Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) frequently lack information on compliance with individual elements. We piloted a computerized clinical decision support-based intervention bundle and conducted detailed evaluation of several intervention-related measures. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study of a bundled intervention was performed at 2 acute care community hospitals in Maryland. The bundle had five components: (1) timely placement in enteric precautions, (2) appropriate CDI testing, (3) reducing proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, (4) reducing high-CDI risk antibiotic use, and (5) optimizing use of a sporicidal agent for environmental cleaning. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare measure differences. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate impact on hospital-onset (HO)-CDI. RESULTS: Placement of CDI suspects in enteric precautions before test results did not change. Only hospital B decreased the frequency of CDI testing and reduced inappropriate testing related to laxative use. Both hospitals reduced the use of PPI and high-risk antibiotics. A 75% decrease in HO-CDI immediately postimplementation was observed for hospital B only. CONCLUSION: A CDI reduction bundle showed variable impact on relevant measures. Hospital-specific differential uptake of bundle elements may explain differences in effectiveness, and emphasizes the importance of measuring processes and intermediate outcomes.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Cross Infection , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , Humans , Maryland
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(Suppl 3): S224-S227, 2019 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517972

ABSTRACT

We examined the effect of glove decontamination prior to removal on bacterial contamination of healthcare personnel hands in a laboratory simulation study. Glove decontamination reduced bacterial contamination of hands following removal. However, hand contamination still occurred with all decontamination methods, reinforcing the need for hand hygiene following glove removal.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Load , Decontamination , Gloves, Protective , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand/microbiology , Health Personnel , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Fluorescence , Humans , Simulation Training
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(Suppl 3): S228-S230, 2019 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517980

ABSTRACT

We conducted a laboratory simulation to evaluate the contamination of environmental surfaces when using wipe vs spray methods of personal protective equipment (PPE) decontamination. We did not observe any environmental contamination with the bacteriophage MS-2 when bleach solution spray or wipes were used for PPE disinfection.


Subject(s)
Decontamination/methods , Gloves, Protective/virology , Protective Clothing/virology , Viral Load/drug effects , Aerosols/pharmacology , Bacteriophages/drug effects , Bleaching Agents/pharmacology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Simulation Training
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(3): 346-348, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314747

ABSTRACT

Hand hygiene compliance is subject to the Hawthorne effect, which may be attenuated by covert observers and brief observation periods. This study demonstrated that hand hygiene compliance rates were between 8% and 29% greater when reported by infection prevention programs than when reported by covert observers over brief observation periods.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/methods , Health Personnel , Infection Control/methods , Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic , Humans
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(10): 1160-1166, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29803592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tools can aid process improvement in infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship, but implementation and health care workers (HCWs) uptake of these tools is often variable. The objective of this study was to describe HCWs' perceptions of barriers and facilitators related to uptake of CCDS tools as part of a CDI reduction bundle. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among HCWs at 2 acute care hospitals in Maryland. Semi-structured interviews and structured surveys were completed by HCWs to evaluate their perception to CCDS tools at 2 different stages: predevelopment and preimplementation. Emergent themes and patterns in the data were identified and condensed. RESULTS: Gaps in CDI-related knowledge and in communication between HCWs were identified throughout the evaluation. HCWs agreed on the potential of the tools to improve CDI diagnosis, prevention, and control. An important barrier for uptake was the perceived loss of autonomy and clinical judgment, whereas standardization and error reduction were perceived advantages. CONCLUSIONS: These observations shaped the development and implementation of the CDI reduction bundle. Qualitative findings can provide valuable contextual information during the development stages of CCDS tools in infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Utilization/standards , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Humans
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28167543

ABSTRACT

Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Carbapenem antibiotics are used as a first line of therapy against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae We examined a cohort of critical care patients for gastrointestinal colonization with carbapenem-resistant ESBL-producing strains (CR-ESBL strains). We cultured samples from this cohort of patients for ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli and then tested the first isolate from each patient for susceptibility to imipenem, doripenem, meropenem, and ertapenem. Multilocus sequence typing was performed on isolates that produced an ESBL and that were carbapenem resistant. Among all patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), 4% were positive for an ESBL-producing isolate and 0.64% were positive for a CR-ESBL strain on surveillance culture. Among the first ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella isolates from the patients' surveillance cultures, 11.2% were carbapenem resistant. Sequence type 14 (ST14), ST15, ST42, and ST258 were the dominant sequence types detected in this cohort of patients, with ST15 and ST258 steadily increasing in prevalence from 2006 to 2009. Patients colonized by a CR-ESBL strain were significantly more likely to receive antipseudomonal and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (anti-MRSA) therapy prior to ICU admission than patients colonized by carbapenem-susceptible ESBL-producing strains. They were also significantly more likely to have received a cephalosporin or a carbapenem antibiotic than patients colonized by carbapenem-susceptible ESBL-producing strains. In conclusion, in a cohort of patients residing in intensive care units within the United States, we found that 10% of the isolates were resistant to at least one carbapenem antibiotic. The continued emergence of carbapenem-resistant ESBL-producing strains is of significant concern, as infections due to these organisms are notoriously difficult to treat.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella/drug effects , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Adult , Aged , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Critical Care , Doripenem , Ertapenem , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Gene Expression , Genotype , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Klebsiella/genetics , Klebsiella/growth & development , Klebsiella/metabolism , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Male , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Thienamycins/pharmacology , United States/epidemiology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
11.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 86(4): 345-350, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27640081

ABSTRACT

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as an important cause of healthcare-associated infections causing great morbidity and mortality. Despite its clinical importance, it is still unknown which molecular typing method is the best to determine or confirm institutional outbreaks as well as to identify epidemiologically related isolates from different geographical areas. To determine the most discriminatory molecular typing method, we isolated A. baumannii from perianal swabs collected from intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a cohort study during 2002 and 2008. Strains from each year were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), and multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). Genetic relatedness of the isolates was consistent between PFGE and MLST as well as between analyses of loci containing MLVA and MLST. Our data show that PFGE and MLVA are similar when discriminating between isolates and are both good methods to use when questioning whether two isolates are indistinguishable.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/epidemiology , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/classification , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Disease Outbreaks , Molecular Typing/methods , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Cohort Studies , Genotype , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Molecular Epidemiology/methods , Perineum/microbiology
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(12): 1244-51, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24225608

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns across US pediatric healthcare institutions are unknown. A national pooled pediatric antibiogram (1) identifies nationwide trends in antimicrobial resistance, (2) allows across-hospital benchmarking, and (3) provides guidance for empirical antimicrobial regimens for institutions unable to generate pediatric antibiograms. METHODS: In January 2012, a request for submission of pediatric antibiograms between 2005 and 2011 was sent to 233 US hospitals. A summary antibiogram was compiled from participating institutions to generate proportions of antimicrobial susceptibility. Temporal and regional comparisons were evaluated using χ(2) tests and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: Of 200 institutions (85%) responding to our survey, 78 (39%) reported generating pediatric antibiograms, and 55 (71%) submitted antibiograms. Carbapenems had the highest activity against the majority of gram-negative organisms tested, but no antibiotic had more than 90% activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Approximately 50% of all Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin resistant. Western hospitals had significantly lower proportions of S. aureus that were methicillin resistant compared with all other regions tested. Overall, 21% of S. aureus isolates had resistance to clindamycin. Among Enterococcus faecium isolates, the prevalence of susceptibility to ampicillin (25%) and vancomycin (45%) was low but improved over time (P< .01), and 8% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to linezolid. Southern hospitals reported significantly higher prevalence of E. faecium with susceptibilities to ampicillin, vancomycin, and linezolid compared with the other 3 regions (P< .01). CONCLUSIONS: A pooled, pediatric antibiogram can identify nationwide antimicrobial resistance patterns for common pathogens and might serve as a useful tool for benchmarking resistance and informing national prescribing guidelines for children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Hospitals, Pediatric/trends , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States
13.
J Bacteriol ; 194(11): 3028-9, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582383

ABSTRACT

Klebsiella oxytoca strain 11492-1 was isolated from a perianal swab culture from a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center in 2005. The K. oxytoca 11492-1 draft genome contains multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including a FOX-5 AmpC ß-lactamase encoded on a large IncA/C plasmid.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Cross Infection/microbiology , Genome, Bacterial , Klebsiella oxytoca/enzymology , Klebsiella oxytoca/genetics , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Base Sequence , Humans , Klebsiella oxytoca/classification , Klebsiella oxytoca/isolation & purification , Molecular Sequence Data , beta-Lactamases/genetics
14.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(7): 2466-8, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535993

ABSTRACT

This study determined the survivability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) for extended periods of time and temperatures using a standard swab for assessment. Our study showed that transportation in Liquid Amies medium could be performed at room temperature or 4°C for up to 14 days without a decrease in recovery of MRSA or VRE.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Enterococcus/physiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Microbial Viability , Specimen Handling/methods , Vancomycin Resistance , Culture Media/chemistry , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Enterococcus/radiation effects , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/radiation effects , Temperature , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...